![]() Now put this into the game and you will realize trying to kill everyone is not the best way. They just camped and got economic superiority and built a military on that. They are not really strong now? Now compare with why The US "won" in WW2, they were not in WW1. Then they will have to recover and will be weaker to attack their bigger cities.īut if your playing a very hard difficulty or challenge a victory with many losses could be worth it for the resources.īut think about how its has gone about countries that were big warmongers in reality, like The Ottomans, Mongolia, The Roman Empire, The British Empire, Persia, and more. Those numbers of losses is only acceptable when your defending and when your attacking someone about to win.īut sometimes a good strategy is a hit and run tactic, where you attack their small undefended outposts. ![]() ![]() I wouldn't really attack someone when i have the possibility to lose 25% of my army. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |